Jakarta, cartitleloans Indonesia
—
The Indonesian U-23 national team was able to hold Mali U-23 to a draw with a score of 2-2 in the second trial match at Pakansari Stadium, Cibinong, Bogor on Tuesday (18/11) evening.
Apart from that, the news that FIFA decided that the documents of seven Malaysian naturalized players had been proven to be fake was the news that most attracted readers’ attention on Tuesday (18/11).
1. Struick Scores Goal, Indonesia U-23 Defends Mali
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The Indonesian U-23 national team matched Mali 2-2 in the second leg of the international trial match at Pakansari Stadium, Cibinong, Tuesday (18/11).
The first half of the Indonesia vs Mali match ended in a 1-1 draw.The visiting team Mali took the lead through Sekou Kone’s goal in the 11th minute.Indonesia then equalized in the 38th minute thanks to Mauro Zijlstra’s kick.
Rafael Struick brought the U-23 Indonesian National Team back to a 2-1 lead in the 52nd minute.However, Sekou Kone broke into Indonesia’s goal again in the 70th minute.
2. FIFA Confirms 7 Malaysian Naturalization Documents Are Fake
FIFA has confirmed that documents submitted to support the eligibility of seven naturalized Malaysian players are fake.
This was revealed after the FIFA Appeals Committee issued an official statement regarding the factors for rejecting the appeal submitted by the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) regarding the falsification of documents for seven naturalized players.
The seven naturalized Malaysian national team players who were proven to have falsified documents were Gabriel Felipe Arrocha, Facundo Tomas Garces, Rodrigo Julian Holgado, Imanol Javier Machuca, Joao Vitor Brandao Figueiredo, Jon Irazabal Iraurgui and Hector Alejandro Hevel Serrano.
3. British media underestimated Ridho’s goal at the Puskas Award
The British media questioned and underestimated the goal of Persija Jakarta player, Rizky Ridho, who could be nominated for the Puskas Award or best goal of the year.
“Yeah, great, but is this one of the 11 best goals of the year? Really?”Planet Football wrote in the first paragraph when reviewing Ridho’s goal.Ridho’s goal was considered good, but it didn’t deserve Puskas’ 11 nominations.
“Call us trite, but we’ve become a bit immune to long-range shots that trick the stranded goalkeeper. It’s boring.”This media gave reasons why Ridho’s goal did not deserve to be nominated.
[Gambas:cartitleloans Video]
(abs/abs/ptr)
