Jakarta, cartitleloans Indonesia
—
Nikita Mirzani
assesses that the demands given to him by the prosecutor in the extortion case far exceed the corruption case.He was sentenced to 11 years in prison and a fine of IDR 2 billion based on the lawsuit from Reza Gladys.
This charge was given because based on the facts revealed at trial, the prosecutor said, Nikita had been proven to have committed the crime of extortion accompanied by threats and TPPU.
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“I defeated corruptors, you know?”said Nikita Mirzani when leaving the courtroom as reported
20 Sec
on Thursday (9/10).
“The demand is 11 years, there’s no problem. That’s a demand, yes, a demand from the prosecutor, the prosecutor has the right to sue, whatever he likes, the important thing is that the prosecutor has finished. The prosecutor has no more demands.”
He stated that now was the time to speak up.Nikita ensured that she immediately prepared a defense or plea.He said the plea was still in the process of being drafted.
[Gambas:cartitleloans Video]
In parallel, he said he would file a counterclaim to claim losses during the legal process.
“Pleidoi next week, I’ll make small installments, right? When I go home I’ll immediately make another plea,” he said.
The demand for 11 years in prison was filed because the prosecutor believed that Nikita had distributed information and/or electronic documents containing extortion content with threats to defame her good name.
This is as regulated in Article 45 paragraph 10 letter A in conjunction with Article 27B paragraph (2) of the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.
The crime involved Nikita’s assistant, Ismail Marzuki alias Mail Syahputra, in connection with extortion and threats against the owner of the skincare product company PT Glafidsya RMA Group.
Reza Gladys’ beauty products were threatened with negative comments and spread on social media by Nikita if she didn’t give him hush money.
There was IDR 4 billion which was finally given in stages by Reza Gladys to Ismail and Nikita.
The prosecutor added that Nikita was also proven to have violated Article 3 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code.
Previously, in the indictment read out last June, the prosecutor said that Nikita used IDR 4 billion to pay off a house in the Bumi Serpong Damai (BSD) area, Tangerang.
Nikita made a payment to PT Bumi Parama Wisesa (BPW), a property company in the BSD area.
(chri)
