Jakarta, cartitleloans Indonesia
–
Former Deputy Chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court (PN) Muhammad Arif Nuryanta was charged with receiving a bribe of Rp40 billion in the case of the free verdict of the Corruption Defendant to grant the facility
export crude palm oil
(CPO) and its derivatives.
Arif’s actions were carried out together with a number of other defendants.
Thus contained in the indictment read out in the inaugural hearing at the Corruption Court (Corruption) at the Central Jakarta District Court (PN), Wednesday (8/20).
“That the defendant Muhammad Arif Nuryanta had done or participated in, who received a prize or promise, in the form of cash in the form of US $ 2,500,000 or Rp. 40,000,000,” said the Public Prosecutor (JPU) of the Central Jakarta District Attorney Syamsul Bahri Siregar.
Receipts of money allegedly bribery carried out by Arif together with Judge Djuyamto, Agam Syarief Baharudin, and Ali Muhtarom (demanded in separate files).
The three names referred to are the Central Jakarta Corruption Court judges who examined and decided on the corruption case of the Crude Palm Oil (CPO) export facilities and their derivatives in the palm oil industry in January 2022 to April 2022 on behalf of the Defendant of the Permata Hijau Group, Wilmar Group, and the Mas Group Season.
Services detailed the first revenue in the form of cash of US $ 100 in cash amounting to US $ 500,000 or equivalent to Rp.8,000,000,000.
Arif was said to have accepted in the US $ fraction of Rp3,300,000,000, a former Young Civil Registrar of North Jakarta District Court Wahyu Gunawan also received in US $ denominations worth Rp800,000,000, Djuyamto in US $ denominations and SIN $ worth Rp1,700,000,000, Agam Syarief accepted in US $ and SIN $ worth Rp.
While the second revenue in the form of US $ 100 is US $ 2,000,000 or equivalent to Rp32,000,000,000.The details are Arif accepted in US $ denominations worth Rp12,400,000,000, Wahyu Gunawan of US $ 100,000 or Rp1,600,000,000, Djuyamto in US $ denominations worth Rp7,800,000,000, Agam Syarief in US $ bills worth Rp5,100,000,000, and Ali Muhtarom in US $ worth Rp5,100,000,000.
The prosecutor said the money was received from Ariyanto, Marcella Santoso, Junaedi Saibih and M. Syafe’i as advocates or those representing the interests of the defendant Wilmar Group, Permata Hijau Group and the Mas Group season.
The money affected the decision of the three corporate defendants in question.Djuyamto et al dropped off or Onslag van Alle Recht Vervolging.
The bribery crime was carried out at the Central Jakarta District Court Office, the house at the Ebony Cluster Jalan Ebony VI Blok AE No.28 Sukapura Cilincing District, North Jakarta;Pakubuwono Apartment Jalan Sultan Iskandar Muda, Kebayoran Lama District, South Jakarta;Seafood Screen Restaurant Jalan Sedayu Boulevard Raya No.1 Kelapa Gading East Jakarta;Parkiran Basement Pacific Place Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kav 52-53 Senayan South Jakarta.
Then at BRI Bank on Jalan Veteran, Central Jakarta;Mediterranean Kemayoran Apartment, Central Jakarta;Warung Soto Seger Mbok Giyem on Jalan Bangka Raya No.101 South Jakarta;and Leaf Muda Restaurant Jl.Wolter Monginsidi, South Jakarta.
The wise actions are as regulated and threatened with Article 12 letter c Subsidair Article 6 paragraph 2 juncto Article 18 of the Corruption Eradication Act (Corruption Law) juncto Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code.
Or Article 12 letter a subsidair Article 12 letter b juncto Article 18 of the Corruption Act juncto Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.
Or Article 5 paragraph 2 Subsidair Article 11 juncto Article 18 of the Corruption Act juncto Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.
Gratification is considered bribery
In his indictment, the prosecutor also included gratification indictments considered bribery (fourth indictment).The amount of gratification receipts is considered bribery as above, namely Rp3,300,000,000 and Rp12,400,000,000.
“That the defendant Muhammad Arif Nuryanta received gratification is considered bribery when it comes to his position and opposite to his obligations or duties,” said the prosecutor.
In this case the prosecutor imposed Article 12 B juncto Article 18 of the Corruption Act.
(ryn/wis)
[Gambas: cartitleloans video]
Read More: TODDLERS IN SUKABUMI DIED, ALLEGEDLY HIS BODY WAS FILLED with Worms
Read More: Tompi ‘ Slepet ’Government and officials about music royalties
